Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41059243›Full record

ArticleBeyoglu eye journal2025

Exploring Health Tourism and Corneal Refractive Surgery: Insights From a Single Referral Center.

Yusuf Berk Akbas, Ahmet Alperen Koc

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Beyoglu eye journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yusuf Berk AkbasDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Ahmet Alperen KocDepartment of Ophthalmology, Istanbul Aydin University, Medical Park Florya Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the characteristics, clinical outcomes, and complications of health tourism patients who underwent corneal refractive surgery with the local patient group. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the medical records of 736 health tourism patients and 853 local patients who presented for corneal refractive surgery. Patient demographics, type of laser procedure, visual and refractive outcomes, complications, and follow-up period were recorded. Results: The mean ages of health tourism patients and local patients were 27.1±5.9 and 26.3±5.3 (p=0.216), respectively. The percentage of patients who underwent surgery was significantly higher among health tourism patients (91.0%) compared to local patients (78.2%) (p<0.01). There were no significant differences in uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, or spherical equivalent at the 3-month post-operative examination. The median follow-up period for health tourism patients was 1 (1-360) day, while for local patients, it was 360 (30-1080) days (p<0.001). The percentage of patients who received laser-assisted Conclusion: Health tourism patients were more likely to have undergone surgery and had a significantly shorter follow-up period. This may particularly affect the follow-up of the long-term complications.

Indexed as

ComplicationsCorneal refractive surgeryHealth tourismLaser in situ keratomileusisPhotorefractive keratectomy

Identifiers

PMID41059243
PMCPMC12499724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.