Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41059196›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Implementing pharmacogenetic testing in community pharmacy practice: a scoping review.

Aude Coumau, Claire Coumau, Chantal Csajka

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aude CoumauCenter for Research and Innovation in Clinical Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Claire CoumauCenter for Research and Innovation in Clinical Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Chantal CsajkaCenter for Research and Innovation in Clinical Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of pharmacogenetics (PGx) has expanded significantly in recent years, with growing evidence supporting its role in enhancing medication effectiveness and reducing adverse drug events. Yet, the integration of PGx into routine clinical practice remains limited. Community pharmacies hold a key position in the healthcare system, offering expert medication advice and maintaining close patient contact due to their accessibility. This context has driven research efforts to integrate PGx testing into healthcare systems in various countries. However, evidence on optimal strategies for embedding PGx services in community pharmacy settings is still emerging. We conducted a scoping review to provide a comprehensive overview of the implementation of PGx testing in community pharmacies, focusing on both successful strategies and challenges. A systematic search of studies involving PGx testing in community pharmacies was conducted using PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science, including all publications up to February 2025. The search considered implementation outcomes: feasibility, acceptability, adoption, fidelity, appropriateness, cost, penetration and sustainability. The process and reporting followed the PRISMA recommendations for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Study findings were classified according to Proctor's implementation outcomes. A total of 17 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Key implementation variables were extracted from these studies. Feasibility was supported by a manageable time process and high technical success. The appropriateness of PGx was reflected in its ability to identify numerous medication-related issues. Adoption varied between patients and prescribers. While patient engagement was high, many sharing PGx results with other physicians, integration of PGx recommendations by prescribers was inconsistent. The intervention was generally well accepted, with high satisfaction among patients and pharmacists, although some physicians expressed concerns. These findings illustrate potential approaches to implementing PGx testing in community pharmacy settings. This scoping review demonstrates the potential for PGx testing to become a viable part of routine care in community pharmacies. It highlights positive patient perceptions and provider willingness to adopt testing. However, it also identifies key barriers, including the need for standardized PGx guidelines, education for providers, and reimbursement policies. The study underscores the importance of patient education, seamless integration into pharmacy workflows, and continued research to support successful implementation.

Indexed as

community pharmacy servicesimplementation sciencepharmacogeneticsprecision medicinescoping review

Identifiers

PMID41059196
PMCPMC12497854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.