ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Bridging the regulatory gap: a call for a regional, evidence-informed approach to e-cigarette control in Latin America.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of Electronic Cigarette use in Latin America and the Caribbean: A systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of community health · 2026Pooled it
- Strategies for harm reduction in Latin America: the example of tobacco.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electronic cigarettes, a subset of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), have rapidly gained global popularity, with adolescent and young adult uptake emerging as a key public health concern. Promoted as "healthier alternatives" to smoking and often marketed as cessation aids, these devices have not created the anticipated risk-reduction environment and instead threaten to erode hard-won gains in tobacco control. While international experience highlights the potential effectiveness of policies such as taxation, age restrictions, marketing bans, and smoke-free environment laws, results remain heterogeneous and context-dependent, with enforcement playing a critical role. In Latin America, tobacco use declined from 28% in 2000 to 16.3% in 2020 under the World Health Organization (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), yet electronic cigarette regulation has lagged, resulting in what can be described as an "unregulated epidemic." Policy responses remain fragmented: some countries enforce comprehensive bans, others apply partial measures, and many still lack specific frameworks, leaving critical gaps in taxation, surveillance, and digital marketing oversight. This regulatory asymmetry facilitates youth-oriented market expansion and the re-normalization of nicotine consumption. Drawing on global lessons, this perspective argues that Latin America must avoid replicating the decades-long delay experienced with tobacco regulation. Instead, the region requires harmonized, evidence-informed, and context-sensitive frameworks that integrate ENDS-specific measures-such as flavor restrictions, comprehensive advertising bans, nicotine caps, and strict control of online sales-supported by robust enforcement and multisectoral coordination. Such an approach offers the best opportunity to contain this unregulated epidemic, safeguard public health, and protect future generations across the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.