ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Policy practice for narrowing urban-rural healthcare gaps: determinants and implementation path of the urban doctors servicing rural areas policy in Beijing, China.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Empowered "Walking Hospitals": A Narrative Review of Innovative Models and Ecosystem Construction in Rural Healthcare.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The urban-rural disparities in healthcare resources and service quality remain a critical challenge for equitable public health development in China. To address this, Beijing has implemented the "Urban Doctors Serving Rural Areas (UDSR)" policy-a key counterpart support initiative. Its core goal is to bridge urban-rural healthcare gaps by mobilizing urban medical professionals to serve rural institutions. Methods: Grounded in Van Meter and Van Horn's policy implementation framework, this study employs fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA). It examines 39 annual observations from 13 paired urban-rural hospitals in Beijing over 2017-2019. To capture temporal changes, the study applies time-series QCA techniques. It analyzes conditions including support project quantity, subsidy source diversification, prescription rights, professional matching, communication channels, and policy cognition, with rural medical technology improvement as the outcome variable. Results: Three critical determinants of UDSR policy effectiveness are identified: the number of support projects, diversified subsidy sources, and prescription rights for urban doctors in rural institutions. Four implementation pathways are uncovered: (1) goal-and-cognition-driven, (2) professional-matching-driven, (3) external-funding-driven, and (4) comprehensive-factor-driven. Temporal analysis reveals two evolutionary paths: a dominant path achieved via integrating multiple factors, and a transitional path shifting from external funding reliance to professional alignment and goal cognition-reflecting adaptive maturation of the UDSR policy. Conclusion: This study advances understanding of counterpart support policy implementation by revealing synergistic combinations of influencing factors and dynamic evolutionary paths. The findings make two key contributions. Theoretically, they provide insights for policy implementation research in non-western contexts; practically, they offer guidance for optimizing urban-rural healthcare resource allocation and provide a framework for refining targeted support mechanisms in China and similar developing countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.