ArticleRadiology advances2024
Awake pediatric brain-MRI: a fast multi-sequence scan augmented with motion compensated single-shot 2D acquisitions.
Article in Radiology advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prospective Head Motion Correction in T1- and T2-Weighted Long Echo Train Sequences Using Servo Navigation.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Ultra-Fast Sub-Minute Brain MRI with Deep-Learning-reconstruction for Anesthesia-Free Emergency Imaging in Children.Clinical neuroradiology · 2026Article
- A Pilot Feasibility Study of Neurodevelopmental Surveillance After the Fontan Operation Using a Sedation-Free Brain MRI Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- An Exploration of Motion-Sampling Interactions in 3D MRI for Neuroimaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is susceptible to motion artifacts, a particular challenge in pediatric imaging. External motion tracking devices and navigator techniques have been previously explored, but challenges persist necessitating sedation. Purpose: To establish a new awake brain-MRI exam tolerated by children with diagnostic quality images. Materials and Methods: Participants were prospectively recruited and investigated using an in-house developed multi-sequence scan called NeuroMix that produces T1-weighted, T2-weighted, T2*-weighted, T2-FLAIR, and diffusion-weighted images in under 3 minutes. Additionally, a self-created motion tracking device was attached to participants' foreheads to perform prospective motion correction (PMC) on 2D single-shot sequences that produce higher resolution images of the same contrasts as NeuroMix.Three neuroradiologists scored the completed series for artifacts. The effects of age group (<5 vs ≥5 years) and sequence type (NeuroMix vs PMC) were evaluated with a Chi Results: Of the 64 participants recruited (mean age 6.7 years [2.7 standard deviation]) 58 completed their examination. Head motion recorded during PMC sequences revealed prevalent superior-inferior displacements [25% (67/293) exceeding 13.2 mm], and chin-up/down rotations [25% (67/293) exceeding 13.7°]. Sequence redundancy through NeuroMix and PMC scans resulted in 93% (54/58) of completed examinations having all series essential for producing an MRI-report rated as artifact-free, and therefore a report of high confidence in 84% (54/64) of participants. 22% (13/58) of completed exam reports could have been written using NeuroMix alone, the remaining required PMC- T2-weighted or T2-FLAIR sequences. Conclusion: This protocol reliably provided diagnostic quality images and reports with high radiologist confidence and could reduce the use of procedure sedation in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.