ArticleEndoscopy international open2025
Anti-reflux barrier competency can be estimated by gastric folds stretching during intragastric insufflation without special equipment.
Article in Endoscopy international open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intragastric Pressure Required to Achieve Strong Extension of the Gastric Wall for Invasion Depth Assessment in Early Gastric Cancer: A Single-Center Prospective Observational Study.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Changes in endoscopic pressure study integrated system (EPSIS) parameters after antireflux surgery and their association with postoperative clinical outcomes.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and study aims: Although the endoscopic pressure study integrated system (EPSIS) is useful to evaluate competency of lower esophageal sphincter as a major part of the anti-reflux barrier, its availability is limited. This study aimed to assess whether gastric fold stretching during insufflation can predict intragastric pressure (IGP) without special equipment. Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis included 33 patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy and EPSIS between June and July 2024. Gastric fold stretching along the greater curvature at the level of the cardia, observed in a retroflex view during insufflation, was compared with EPSIS results by reviewing recorded videos. Time ranges were defined as follows, and IGP was measured at the end of each range: Time range 1, until the ratio of longitudinal fold thickness to the groove width between folds reached 1:2; Time range 2, until the ratio reached 1:4; and Time range 3, until the folds or mucosal ridges were almost flattened. Variability was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV), calculated as the standard deviation divided by the mean. Results: Time ranges 1, 2, and 3 were fully observed in 100%, 97%, and 70% of patients, respectively. Mean IGPs at the end of Time ranges 1, 2, and 3 were 8.9, 11.1, and 17.7 mmHg, with CVs of 0.32, 0.28, and 0.08, respectively. Conclusions: Flattening of gastric folds or mucosal ridges during insufflation is a reliable predictor of IGP. This finding may help identify patients with anti-reflux barrier dysfunction during regular endoscopic examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.