ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2025
A Rare Paradoxical Reaction in Cutaneous Tuberculosis: Insight from a Case of Lupus Vulgaris.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Lupus vulgaris (LV) is the most common form of paucibacillary cutaneous tuberculosis (TB), which is treatable with antituberculosis treatment (ATT). Otherwise, paradoxical reaction (PR) is an adverse clinical consequence of restoring the specific antigen immune response elicited by ATT. Case Presentation: We report a case of PR in a 20-year-old female patient with LV, who had previously completed treatment for meningitis and lymphadenitis TB and had a history of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Initially, the patient presented with reddish papules on the neck, which appeared four months before consultation. The skin lesions progressively enlarged and failed to heal completely despite treatment, accompanied by knee joint pain. Physical examination revealed well-defined reddish-brown plaques measuring 1.5×1×0.1 cm on the neck and 5×3×0.5 cm beneath the right chin with gyrate borders. Diascopy tests revealed an "apple jelly" sign, while dermoscopy demonstrated yellowish-white globules on a pinkish-red background. Histopathological examination revealed tuberculoid granulomas, Langhans giant cells, and epithelioid cells with caseous necrosis. Based on these findings, a diagnosis of LV was established. However, bacteriological culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing showed no evidence of Conclusion: Although PR is rare, it should be considered in patients who demonstrate clinical deterioration after ATT. Clinicians should be aware of its occurrence in cutaneous TB, particularly LV, to ensure timely recognition and appropriate management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.