ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025
Regional CSF volume quantification using deep learning for comparative analysis of brain atrophy in frontotemporal dementia subtypes.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) encompasses heterogeneous clinical syndromes, and distinguishing its subtypes using imaging remains challenging. Methods: We developed a deep learning model to quantify brain atrophy by measuring cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volumes in key regions of interest (RoIs) on standard MRI scans. In a retrospective study, we analyzed 3D T1-weighted MRI data from 1,854 individuals, including cognitively unimpaired (CU) controls, patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT), and FTD subtypes: behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), nonfluent variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA), and semantic variant PPA (svPPA). The model quantified CSF volumes in 14 clinically relevant RoIs and generated age- and sex-adjusted W-scores to express regional atrophy. Results: Each FTD subtype exhibited a distinct, lateralized atrophy pattern: bvFTD showed widespread bilateral frontal and right-predominant parietal and temporal atrophy; nfvPPA showed left-predominant frontal and parietal atrophy; and svPPA exhibited marked left-lateralized temporal and hippocampal atrophy. All FTD subtypes demonstrated significantly greater CSF expansion in these characteristic regions compared to DAT and CU. Discussion: This deep learning approach provides a simple, interpretable measure of brain atrophy that differentiates FTD subtypes, requiring only standard MRI with minimal preprocessing, and offers clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.