Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41059011›Full record

ReviewDental research journal2025

Combined treatment approach: A review of using clear aligners in orthognathic surgery procedures.

Atefe Ahmadvand, Hossein Ebrahimi, Zahra Amiri, Parisa Besharatizadeh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dental research journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Atefe AhmadvandDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hossein EbrahimiDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahed University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Zahra AmiriDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahed University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Parisa BesharatizadehDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahed University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Clear aligner therapy (CAT) was originally introduced for minor orthodontic corrections. However, with technological advances and increasing patient demands for esthetic and comfortable treatments, its application has expanded into more complex cases, including orthognathic surgery. This narrative review explores the use of clear aligners across all phases of orthognathic treatment, such as presurgical, surgical, and postsurgical. Materials and Methods: The literature from 2000 to 2025 was analyzed, identifying 34 relevant studies. Results: Findings indicate that CAT can effectively manage dentofacial deformities such as skeletal Class II and III malocclusions, open bites, and craniofacial anomalies when used pre- and/or postoperatively. Conclusion: Clear aligners offer significant advantages in esthetics, oral hygiene, treatment comfort, and quality of life. The combination of surgery and CAT has been demonstrated to reduce treatment time and increase patient satisfaction without compromising skeletal stability. Although there are some limitations, such as concerns about relapse and aligner rigidity in early postoperative phases, the results of occlusal stability, periodontal health, and patient satisfaction are promising. The increasing use of CAT in orthognathic surgery cases, particularly in digitally driven interdisciplinary treatment plans, is supported by this review as an effective and patient-centered alternative to fixed appliances.

Indexed as

Clear aligner therapydigital orthodonticsorthognathic surgerysurgery-first approachsurgical splints

Identifiers

PMID41059011
PMCPMC12500242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.