ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Real-world effect of intermittent calorie-restricted diet on type 2 diabetes remission: a dual-cohort retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intermittent energy restriction and risk of physician-diagnosed diabetes progression: a propensity-weighted real-world cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that intermittent calorie-restricted diet (ICR) can lead to diabetes remission. We aimed to assess the diabetes remission with ICR among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in real-world settings. Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective, dual-cohort study (January 2022-July 2023) using real-world data from Chinese patients with T2D. The ICR cohort consisted of 1,069 patients following an intermittent calorie-restricted diet, while the control cohort consisted of 1,099 patients receiving Dietary Guidelines for Diabetes in China (2017 Edition). The primary outcome was diabetes remission. Secondary outcomes included reductions in antidiabetic medication use and changes in fasting blood glucose (FBG). Subgroup evaluations for the sensitivity analysis were conducted to further assess outcomes. The study employed a combination of univariate and multivariate analyses, including Linear Mixed-Effects Models (LMM), Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Models (GLMM), and Cox regression with propensity score-weighted Inverse Probability Weighting (IPW), to evaluate relationships between cohort and outcomes. Results: In real-world settings, the ICR cohort achieved significantly higher remission rates (20% vs. 2%, Conclusion: This study demonstrated the practical efficacy of ICR in achieving diabetes remission. These findings establish dietary interventions as a powerful and viable strategy for T2D remission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.