ArticleRadiology advances2025
Deep learning pipeline for fully automated myocardial infarct segmentation from clinical cardiac MR scans.
Article in Radiology advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: Where Do We Stand?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: From Automated Acquisition to Precision Diagnostics and Clinical Decision Support.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: Current Landscape, Clinical Impact, and Future Directions.Discoveries (Craiova, Romania)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated promise in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, particularly in myocardial infarct segmentation, where it may help reduce variability and workload in clinical practice. Purpose: To develop and evaluate a deep learning-based model that performs myocardial infarct segmentation in a fully automated way. Materials and Methods: For this retrospective study, a cascaded framework of 2- and 3-dimensional convolutional neural networks (CNNs), specialized in identifying ischemic myocardial scars on late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) CMR images, was trained on an in-house training dataset of 144 examinations acquired using a 1.5 Tesla Siemens scanner collected between 2006 and 2022. On a separate test dataset from the same institution, comprising images from 152 examinations, a quantitative comparison was conducted between AI-based segmentations and manual segmentations. Further, segmentation accuracy was assessed qualitatively for both human and AI-generated contours by 2 CMR experts in a blinded experiment. Most cases underwent single human assessment, with double reading conducted only on a subset of 20 cases. Results: Excellent agreement was found between manually and automatically calculated infarct volumes (ρ Conclusion: This fully automated segmentation pipeline enables the calculation of CMR infarct size without requiring any pre-processing of the input images while matching the segmentation quality of trained human observers. As automated infarct segmentation is preferred over manual segmentation, further development of this workflow toward clinical application is warranted to improve efficiencies. Summary: We developed and evaluated an algorithm that performs myocardial infarct segmentation from cardiac MR images without requiring pre-processing and that outperforms trained human observers on qualitative expert judgment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.