Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41058900›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Food and mood: how clean eating content on social media influences affect and body satisfaction in women.

Giulia Cossu, Alina Riefler, Andrea Sabrina Hartmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Giulia CossuUnit of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy of Childhood and Adolescence, Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Alina RieflerUnit of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy of Childhood and Adolescence, Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Andrea Sabrina HartmannUnit of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy of Childhood and Adolescence, Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Body-related content is omnipresent in social media. Its consumption has shown to impact body image and affect. Clean eating content is often related to body-related content but its relation to the aforementioned constructs has not been examined. Methods: In an experimental study, 129 female individuals viewed clean eating or "foodie" content (control condition) on Instagram profiles for 5 min. Positive and negative affect, as well as body satisfaction were measured before and afterwards. We also assessed the behavioral choice of a food after profile viewing, and whether pre-existing vulnerabilities (body dissatisfaction, eating disorder or orthorexic symptoms) impact the change in affect and body satisfaction. Results: There was no significant profile × time interaction effect for positive affect, however it decreased over time ( Discussion: There was no impact of profile on choice of foods. The change in positive affect underlines previously shown potentially detrimental effects of Instagram consumption in general. The findings also give tentative hints toward the potential negative influence of clean eating content consumption on affect and body dissatisfaction. Thus, also a focus on clean eating might need to be incorporated when targeting media literacy in prevention programs.

Indexed as

affectbody satisfactionclean eating contentfoodie contentInstagram

Identifiers

PMID41058900
PMCPMC12497578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.