ArticleRadiology advances2025
Cross-institutional automated multilabel segmentation for acute intracerebral hemorrhage, intraventricular hemorrhage, and perihematomal edema on CT.
Article in Radiology advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Deep learning-based automated segmentation of intracerebral haemorrhage, intraventricular haemorrhage and perihaematomal oedema on non-contrast CT.European stroke journal · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic review of commercial artificial intelligence tools for the detection and volume quantification in intracerebral hemorrhage.European radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Precise volume quantification of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), and perihematomal edema (PHE) is a critical parameter for guiding therapy decisions, monitoring therapeutic effects over time, and predicting patient outcomes. Purpose: To evaluate a nnU-Net-based deep learning model for automated, multilesion segmentation on non-contrast CT. Materials and Methods: Retrospective data from acute spontaneous ICH patients admitted to 4 stroke centers (2015-2022) and controls (2022-2023) were analyzed. Manual segmentations served as ground truth with repeated segmentations as reference standard. nnU-Net was trained ( Results: Test set sensitivity was 99% for ICH and PHE and 97% for IVH. Segmentation achieved a DSC of 0.91 (ICH), 0.71 (PHE), and 0.76 (IVH), with Conclusion: nnU-Net enables reliable, time-efficient segmentation of ICH, PHE, and IVH, validated across multicenter, multivendor datasets of spontaneous ICH, showing potential to enhance clinical workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.