Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41058843›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Sinus Tarsi Approach for Calcaneal Fractures: A Single-Center Comparison of Early Versus Delayed Surgery by a Consultant-Led Orthopedic Team.

Siang Yew Yeo, Fu Yuen Thong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Siang Yew YeoOrthopaedic Department, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital, Kota Kinabalu, MYS.
Fu Yuen ThongOrthopaedic Department, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital, Kota Kinabalu, MYS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The sinus tarsi approach (STA) is a well-established technique for treating displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs) due to its reduced wound complication rates compared to the extensile lateral approach. However, concerns remain regarding the efficacy and safety of STA when performed beyond the 14-day post-injury mark. Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the radiological outcomes and complication rates between early (<14 days) and delayed (≥14 days) STA interventions. Methods This retrospective study was conducted at Hospital Queen Elizabeth II, Sabah, Malaysia. A total of 42 calcanea with DIACFs treated using STA from July 2022 to July 2025 were included. Patients were divided into early (12 calcaneum) and delayed (30 calcaneum) groups based on the timing of surgery. Pre- and postoperative Böhler and Gissane angles were measured and compared. Surgical duration and postoperative complications were analysed. As this was the first series of calcaneal fractures treated using the sinus tarsi approach at our center, all eligible cases (n=42) treated between July 2022 and July 2025 were included. Results The mean preoperative Böhler angle was 9.5°, and it improved postoperatively to 26.6°. The mean preoperative Gissane angle was 116.9°, and it improved to 131.0° postoperatively. No statistically significant differences were found between early and delayed groups for Böhler (p = 0.426) and Gissane angles (p = 0.746). Complication rates were 16.7% for early and 3.3% for delayed groups (p = 0.192). Mean operative time did not significantly differ between the early (107.7 mins) and delayed (113.4 mins) groups (p = 0.599). Conclusion The STA provided consistent radiographic outcomes in both early and delayed interventions. STA remains a safe and adaptable option in our centre, though larger prospective studies with functional outcome assessments are warranted to strengthen external validity.

Indexed as

calcaneum fixationcalcaneum fracturesdisplaced intra-articular calcaneal fractureminimally invasive sinus tarsi approachsinus tarsi approach

Identifiers

PMID41058843
PMCPMC12498189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.