ArticleCureus2025
Comparing the Level of Pain and Oral Hygiene Status in Patients Receiving Fixed Appliance Therapy Versus Clear Aligner Therapy During the First Phase of Orthodontic Treatment: An In Vivo Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients' compliance with orthodontic treatment, particularly in the first phases of therapy, is influenced by the perception of pain and oral hygiene management. Even though clear aligners and fixed orthodontic appliances have the same popularity, their comparative impacts on these early treatment parameters are not well researched.
aimsThe study's intention was to contrast the level of oral hygiene and discomfort experienced by patients undergoing clear aligner therapy at an early stage of orthodontic treatment with those undergoing fixed appliance therapy. METHODOLOGY: Forty patients were gathered and split into two groups at random. Group I was required to wear fixed orthodontic appliances, whereas group II received clear aligners. Age, gender, and the degree of malocclusion were all matched between the groups. The degree of pain was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. To evaluate oral hygiene, the Simplified Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S) was used. Baseline homogeneity was guaranteed by the Index of Complexity, Outcome, and Need (ICON) and Little's Irregularity Index. T-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests (p < 0.05) were used in the statistical analysis.
resultsThe scores on pain were low (3.89, 2.16), and oral hygiene was improved (mean OHI-S = 1.92, 1.06) in those who had clear aligner treatment, but these did not show a significant difference when compared to those who had fixed orthodontic appliances.
conclusionClear aligners potentially provide better patient comfort and allow better oral hygiene in early orthodontic treatment, which makes them a preferable choice for initial patient compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.