ArticleCureus2025
Evaluation of the Correlation of Reading Ability and Fixation Status in Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation of the reading ability obtained by Minnesota low vision reading (MNREAD) and the fixation status by microperimetry and morphological status in Japanese patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Material and methods We analyzed 25 consecutive nAMD patients and selected patients if the distance log MAR best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the studied eye was from 0.3 to 1.0. For reading ability, the reading visual acuity, maximum reading speed (MRS), and critical print size (CPS) were evaluated. Fixation stability (FS) was defined by the percentage of fixation points located within a circle of diameter 2° centered on all fixation points. For morphological status, central retinal thickness (CRT) and lesion size were evaluated. Multiple regression analyses were used to determine independent contributing factors for MRS and CPS. Single regression analyses were also used to determine the relationship between 2°FS, preferred retinal locus (PRL)-fovea distance, and other parameters. Results Fifteen patients had unilateral nAMD, and 10 patients had bilateral nAMD. The lesion size was identified as a factor independently contributing to the MRS. The BCVA of the fellow eye and 2°FS were identified as factors independently contributing to the CPS. The CRT and PRL-fovea distance were significantly negatively correlated with the 2°FS, and age was significantly negatively correlated with the PRL-fovea distance. Conclusion It is possible that there is a relationship between morphology, fixation status, and reading ability in Japanese patients with nAMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.