Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41058813›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Development of a Konjac-Based Surgical Training Model Exhibiting Energy Device Applicability and Tactile Similarity to Animal Tissue.

Gaku Morimoto, Yuma Endo, Sosaku Ichikawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gaku MorimotoTechnical Department, Kotobuki Medical Inc., Yashio, JPN.
Yuma EndoInstitute of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, JPN.
Sosaku IchikawaInstitute of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe use of simulation models in surgical training allows trainees to improve their in-hospital performance. While there are many types of models to simulate human tissue, including animal meat, polyvinyl alcohol, and silicon, each faces some challenges in terms of preservability and energy device applicability. We propose that konjac glucomannan (KGM) is a realistic alternative that can provide trainees with a texture closely resembling that of human tissue. This study was undertaken to describe the similarities between KGM gel and animal meat, as well as to investigate the effect that specific preparation methods can have on KGM gel's texture.

methodsThree types of konjac models (KMs) and animal meat models, including porcine back muscle, porcine liver, and chicken muscle, were prepared. The strength and strain of each model were tested in a way that mimics blunt dissection. The microstructure of KM was also observed via scanning electron microscopy.

resultsThe texture analysis revealed that the strength and strain of the KMs are comparable to those of animal meat. We also found that the additional steps of freezing and moisture removal during the preparation process for the KM preparation have a significant impact on the strength and the strain of the models.

conclusionKMs that are prepared in an appropriate way have great potential for use in surgical training. We believe that KM should be considered a valuable model for medical trainees to experience more realistic surgical training.

Indexed as

dissection forceplant-based materialsurgical simulationsurgical training modeltactile similarity

Identifiers

PMID41058813
PMCPMC12498175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.