ArticleCureus2025
Development of a Konjac-Based Surgical Training Model Exhibiting Energy Device Applicability and Tactile Similarity to Animal Tissue.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Validation of versatile training tissue based on konjac powder materials as a surgical training model.Surgery today · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe use of simulation models in surgical training allows trainees to improve their in-hospital performance. While there are many types of models to simulate human tissue, including animal meat, polyvinyl alcohol, and silicon, each faces some challenges in terms of preservability and energy device applicability. We propose that konjac glucomannan (KGM) is a realistic alternative that can provide trainees with a texture closely resembling that of human tissue. This study was undertaken to describe the similarities between KGM gel and animal meat, as well as to investigate the effect that specific preparation methods can have on KGM gel's texture.
methodsThree types of konjac models (KMs) and animal meat models, including porcine back muscle, porcine liver, and chicken muscle, were prepared. The strength and strain of each model were tested in a way that mimics blunt dissection. The microstructure of KM was also observed via scanning electron microscopy.
resultsThe texture analysis revealed that the strength and strain of the KMs are comparable to those of animal meat. We also found that the additional steps of freezing and moisture removal during the preparation process for the KM preparation have a significant impact on the strength and the strain of the models.
conclusionKMs that are prepared in an appropriate way have great potential for use in surgical training. We believe that KM should be considered a valuable model for medical trainees to experience more realistic surgical training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.