Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41058795›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Epidemiological Characteristics of Custodial Deaths: An Autopsy Study at a Tertiary Care Institute in Rishikesh.

Amit Jangid, Arushi Verma, R Sivasankary, Raviprakash Meshram, Shailesh V Parate, Anubhuti Tyagi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amit JangidForensic Medicine and Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Arushi VermaForensic Medicine and Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
R SivasankaryForensic Medicine and Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Raviprakash MeshramForensic Medicine and Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Shailesh V ParateForensic Medicine and Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Anubhuti TyagiForensic Medicine and Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Custodial death remains a sensitive and critical human rights issue worldwide. Identifying the causes and contributing factors is essential for developing effective interventions and ensuring accountability and dignity for individuals deprived of liberty. Methods This retrospective study analyzed records of custody-related deaths examined by the Department of Forensic Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Rishikesh. A total of 34 autopsies were conducted between January 2020 and May 2025. The data were organized, coded, and charted, then analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0 (Released 2015; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and compared with findings from other national and international studies. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee. Results From 2020 to May 2025, 34 custodial deaths were documented, with the highest number (10 cases) reported in 2023. Most of the deceased were men (91%) and over 40 years old (76%), suggesting increased vulnerability with advancing age. No deaths occurred inside jail; the majority took place at AIIMS, Rishikesh (62%), or during transport (26%), indicating delays or inadequacies in medical care. Although 91% of the deaths were classified as natural, many were linked to preventable conditions such as coronary artery disease and chronic liver disease. Notably, the legal status of nearly half of the deceased was undocumented, revealing major deficiencies in custodial record-keeping and accountability. Conclusions The increasing number of custodial deaths, predominantly among older male inmates, underscores inadequate healthcare and poor documentation in custody. Most deaths occurred outside jail settings, pointing to delays in medical intervention. The absence of legal status records for nearly half of the deceased highlights systemic shortcomings that demand urgent reform.

Indexed as

custodial deathjail inmatenegligent deathpreventable deathprison healthcareprison mortality

Identifiers

PMID41058795
PMCPMC12500288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.