ArticleCureus2025
A Novel 3D-Printed Pediatric Cardiac Model for Teaching Catheterization Anatomy and Access Pathways.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric cardiac catheterization is an essential procedure with limited early trainee exposure and risks of real-time procedural instruction even for late trainees. Traditional teaching tools, such as lectures and diagrams, offer minimal spatial orientation, while commercial simulators are often too costly for widespread use. To address this gap, we developed an anatomically accurate 3D-printed heart model using consumer-grade tools and materials. Anatomically, the model contains hollow lumens running from the femoral arteries through each cardiac chamber and a ventricular septal defect, with a removable front wall for internal viewing. During a structured teaching session, 14 pediatric residents used the model to simulate catheter navigation and identify anatomic landmarks under direct visualization. Post-session feedback (n = 11) showed a mean confidence score increase from 3.45 to 4.27 on a five-point Likert scale. Qualitatively, learners cited improved spatial understanding and procedural clarity. This open-source model provides a cost-effective, reproducible alternative to commercial simulators and may help bridge critical gaps in conceptual training for pediatric cardiac catheterization in resource-limited or early educational settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.