ArticleCase reports in ophthalmology
Unilateral Peri-Orbital Oedema and Mechanical Ptosis: An Unusual Case Presentation of Rosacea.
Article in Case reports in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Rosacea is an inflammatory skin condition that can present with varied ophthalmic manifestations. It is often overlooked by clinicians especially when unilateral in presentation leading to diagnostic delay and a resultant psychosocial impact. We aimed to present a unique case of ocular rosacea, highlighting the difficulty in therapeutic challenges and diagnoses in such rare cases. Case Presentation: A 64-year-old Caucasian man presented with a 9-month history of persistent painless swelling of the right upper eyelid and secondary ptosis. His ophthalmic examination, serology, and MRI were otherwise normal besides mild meibomian gland dysfunction. Punch biopsy results were inconsistent and initially led to a misdiagnosis of benign squamous papillomata and, later, a differential diagnosis of dermatomyositis. He was trialled on appropriate management for these conditions without any benefit. Repeat histopathology was suggestive of rosacea, and given the persistence of symptoms despite multiple treatments, he was successfully managed with a right upper lid debulking biopsy transcutaneous blepharoplasty. Histopathological analysis of the debulking biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of rosacea, with additional features indicative of lymphoedema. Upon follow-up, there was resolution of lid swelling. Conclusion: Due to the non-specific nature of isolated ocular rosacea presentations, it can be easily misdiagnosed and, therefore, should always be considered as a differential diagnosis in persistent peri-orbital oedema. It can additionally pose significant therapeutic challenges for ophthalmologists, underscoring the importance of improving our understanding of ocular rosacea. Further, we have shown the effectiveness of surgical debulking in its management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.