Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41058749›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2025

Information vs situation: balancing transparency and autonomy for trustworthy autonomous vehicles.

Ana Tanevska, Katie Winkle, Ginevra Castellano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ana TanevskaDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Katie WinkleDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ginevra CastellanoDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapid advancement of autonomous vehicle (AV) technology, AVs move beyond their initial purpose of only providing a self-driving and/or assistive driving experience, and progressively transform into interactive agents with some level of autonomy, as well as some context-dependent social features. This introduces new challenges and questions, already relevant in other areas of human-robot interaction (HRI), such as: if an AV is perceived as a social agent by the human with whom it is interacting or collaborating, how are the various facets of its interface and behaviour impacting its human partner? And how do we foster a successful collaboration between the human driver and the AV, maximizing the driver's comfort, agency, and trust in the AV? Our specific research goal in this area is to explore how the human's perception of the AV can vary across different levels of information sharing and autonomy of the AV. More precisely, in this work we sought to understand the various factors that could influence naïve participants' acceptance and trustworthiness of AV. In a between-subjects online study, informed by participatory design, we investigated the effects of different AV interfaces with different information levels on participants' perceptions of the AV, specifically their trust and comfort ratings. We also sought to understand how much the environment and the AV's behaviour play a role in determining the level of autonomy users will grant to the AV. We found that the transparency of the AV (described by the amount of information shared with the users) had a significant impact on people's trust and comfort in the car. Participants' relationship with the AV's autonomy however was more complex, and was influenced both by the AV's transparency, but also by the driving environment and the specific events happening in the scenes.

Indexed as

autonomous vehiclesautonomyethical HRIhuman-AV interactionparticipatory designtransparencytrustworthy HRIuser-centered design

Identifiers

PMID41058749
PMCPMC12497998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.