ArticleRadiology advances2025
Predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in small-for-gestational-age fetuses using MRI, ultrasound, and clinical data.
Article in Radiology advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Normative volumetric growth modeling of the whole fetal body, placenta, and amniotic fluid for three-dimensional T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Regional differences in fetal fat accretion in small-for-gestational-age fetuses assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Normative volumetric growth modeling of the whole fetal body, placenta and amniotic fluid for 3-dimensional T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Existing sonographic approaches offer limited predictive accuracy. Combining fetal MRI, ultrasound and clinical data may improve perinatal prognostication. Purpose: To evaluate whether integrating prenatal MRI, ultrasound, and clinical features using machine learning (ML) improves prediction of adverse perinatal outcomes in FGR or small-for-gestational-age (SGA) pregnancies. Materials and Methods: This single-center study included prospectively enrolled FGR/SGA and retrospectively included appropriate-for-gestational-age cases, with follow-up through neonatal discharge. Twenty-seven features from MRI, ultrasound, and clinical data were used in the final analysis. Seven ML classifiers were trained using stratified 5-fold cross-validation to predict composite adverse neonatal outcomes (CANO) and non-reassuring fetal status (NRFS). Sensitivity and specificity of the top-performing model (based on area under the curve [AUC]) were compared to standard biometric thresholds (estimated fetal weight and/or abdominal circumference <10th/<3rd centiles). Multiparametric, MRI-only, and ultrasound-only models were compared, along with reduced models using 4 features for CANO and 2 for NRFS. Results: One hundred thirty-one participants were included (60 FGR/SGA, 71 appropriate-for-gestational-age). The random forest method achieved the highest AUC for predicting CANO (0.912; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.99) and NRFS (0.834; 95% CI, 0.76-0.91). For CANO, the multiparametric model demonstrated a 25% higher sensitivity ( Conclusions: ML-based models integrating multimodal data may improve risk stratification for predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in FGR/SGA pregnancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.