Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41058718›Full record

ArticleSmall science2025

Addressing Lithium Deficiency in Anode-Free Lithium Metal Batteries: Design Principles and Supplementation Strategies.

Maolin Sun, Kai Tang, Zhichuan J Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Small science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maolin SunSchool of Materials Science and Engineering Nanyang Technological University 639798 Singapore.
Kai TangSchool of Materials Science and Engineering Nanyang Technological University 639798 Singapore.
Zhichuan J XuSchool of Materials Science and Engineering Nanyang Technological University 639798 Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7746-5920

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anode-free lithium metal batteries (AFLMBs) are now considered as a promising next-generation energy storage system due to their exceptional energy density and compatibility with existing lithium-ion battery manufacturing infrastructure. However, their practical deployment is hindered by severe capacity degradation, primarily caused by the irreversible consumption of lithium. This perspective explores how lithium supplementation and recovery strategies can address these challenges by shifting focus from conventional structural engineering to chemical compensation mechanisms. Recent advances are systematically categorized into three main approaches: cathode overlithiation, cathode additives, and electrolyte-based supplementation. For each strategy, the underlying mechanisms, representative materials, and electrochemical performance are critically evaluated. Particular attention is given to lithium storage capacity, decomposition potential, electrochemical compatibility, and byproduct management. The interdependence between lithium compensation methods and electrode/electrolyte design is also examined to clarify their cooperative or competing roles within full-cell configurations. In addition, strategies for recovering inactive lithium, including dead lithium reactivation and solid electrolyte interphase reconstruction, are discussed as complementary pathways. By comparing the advantages and limitations of these approaches, this perspective highlights key material design principles and provides practical insights for advancing AFLMB systems with high-energy density and extended cycling stability.

Indexed as

anode‐free lithium metal batteriescathode additiveselectrolyte additiveslithium supplementationoverlithiation

Identifiers

PMID41058718
PMCPMC12499400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.