Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41058692›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025

Recent advances in adoptive cell therapy for cancer immunotherapy.

Jiameng Qian, Yuhua Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Cellular immunotherapy in melanoma: the next frontier in cancer treatment.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Special Issue "Molecular Advances in Cancer Immunotherapy".International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jiameng QianAffiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yuhua LiuAffiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adoptive cell therapy (ACT), a key direction in tumor immunotherapy, has achieved remarkable progress in recent years. This paper systematically reviews the current status and future trends of ACT, covering lymphokine-activated killer cells (LAK), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), cytokine-induced killer cells (CIK), dendritic cells (DC), T cell receptor-modified T cells (TCR-T), chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T), natural killer (NK) cells, chimeric antigen receptor-modified NK cells (CAR-NK), and the emerging CAR-M. The paper focuses on emerging technological approaches, including universal CAR structural optimization, iPSC-derived cell products, multifunctional CAR design, and AI-assisted antigen screening. It also compares differences among various cell therapies in antigen specificity, efficacy persistence, safety, and clinical application challenges. The core contribution of this paper lies in synthesizing recent research advances to propose strategies for addressing tumor heterogeneity, antigen escape, cell persistence, and therapeutic safety in ACT. This provides a reference for future personalized and precision cell therapy approaches.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveNeoplasmsAnimalsDendritic CellsHumansKiller Cells, NaturalLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingReceptors, Chimeric AntigenReceptors, Chimeric AntigenCAR-MCAR-NKiPSC-derived cellsmacrophage engineeringnext-generation ACT

Identifiers

PMID41058692
PMCPMC12497837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.