ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Examining the relationship between perceived social support and prenatal distress in pregnant women.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Understanding the link between perceived social support and prenatal distress is vital for improving maternal mental health during pregnancy. Objective: To examine the relationship between perceived social support and prenatal distress among pregnant women. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 220 pregnant women at Ayatollah Mousavi Hospital in Zanjan City in 2023. Participants were selected through a convenience sampling method, and data were collected using the Prenatal Distress and social support questionnaires. The analysis involved Spearman's rank correlation, the Mann-Whitney U test, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and backward conditional logistic regression with median cut-off points, all at a 95% confidence level. Results: The average perinatal distress score was 39.38 (SD = 6.04), and the average social support score was 45.66 (SD = 10.91). Total social support was negatively correlated with overall prenatal distress (r = -0.355), childbirth and the baby-related distress (r =-0.472), and emotional/relational issues(r = -0.119), but not with body image-related distress (r = 0.090, p = 0.35). Younger, higher-educated women with more children reported lower distress. Additionally, women aged 18-25, with more children, low income, who were housewives, or had a gestational age of 29-42 weeks, had higher social support scores (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Both perinatal distress and perceived social support were observed at moderate levels among the study population. Parity emerged as the only independent predictor for both prenatal distress and social support, with primiparous women exhibiting higher distress levels, while multiparous women reported higher perceived social support. These findings underscore the importance of developing tailored interventions that address the distinct needs of women according to their parity status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.