ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
The collective lie in ketamine therapy: a call to realign clinical practice with neurobiology.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, ketamine therapy has become increasingly entangled with psychedelic culture, leading to widespread misinterpretation of its therapeutic mechanism. This manuscript challenges the prevailing narrative that positions ketamine as a consciousness-expanding agent or psychotherapy enhancer, highlighting the discord between this view and ketamine's well-established neurobiological function as an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist that promotes neuroplasticity. Drawing on recent research and clinical data, the article argues that the acute dissociative experience often emphasized in ketamine-assisted psychotherapy (KAP) is neither necessary nor sufficient for therapeutic success. Instead, it describes how meaningful, lasting improvement in mental health outcomes requires plasticity-driven reorganization in the days following ketamine administration, not from insights gleaned during dissociation. By prioritizing subjective experience over biological timing, current KAP practitioners risk distorting memory, reinforcing maladaptive narratives, and undermining the potential of psychoplastogenic treatments. This article calls for a shift toward evidence-based protocols that align clinical practice with neurophysiology, advocating for greater education, standardization, and scientific rigor in ketamine therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.