ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Interpretable machine learning model to predict 90-day radiographically confirmed pneumonia after chemotherapy initiation in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: development and internal validation of a single-center cohort.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radiographically confirmed pneumonia within 90 days of chemotherapy initiation is a frequent and clinically important complication in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, yet interpretable tools for early individualized risk estimation are limited. Objective: To develop and internally validate an interpretable machine-learning model that predicts the 90-day risk of radiographically confirmed pneumonia after chemotherapy initiation in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 205 chemotherapy-treated NHL patients. A two-step feature selection (LASSO followed by random-forest-based recursive feature elimination) identified four predictors: high-grade malignancy, drinking (alcohol use), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and smoking. Five algorithms were trained and compared under a stratified 70/30 split (training Results: On the internal hold-out test set ( Conclusion: The interpretable GBM model demonstrated promising discrimination and calibration on an internal hold-out test set; however, clinical deployment requires temporal and multicenter external validation (as well as prospective assessment with potential recalibration). The accompanying web calculator is a research-only prototype and is not intended for clinical decision-making until such validation is completed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.