ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Cyclobenzaprine-related adverse events: a comprehensive pharmacovigilance analysis using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07664956 (Cyclobenzaprine for Postoperative Pain in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cyclobenzaprine for Postoperative Pain in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sublingual Cyclobenzaprine for Fibromyalgia: Pharmacokinetic Rationale, Clinical Evidence, and Place in Therapy.Current pain and headache reports · 2026Review
- Centrally Acting Skeletal Muscle Relaxants Sharing Molecular Targets with Drugs for Neuropathic Pain Management.Brain sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cyclobenzaprine, a centrally-acting muscle relaxant, is widely used for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain. Despite its efficacy, concerns regarding its safety profile, particularly adverse events (AEs), have been increasingly reported. This study aims to comprehensively analyze cyclobenzaprine-related AEs using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to identify potential safety signals and inform clinical practice. Methods: A retrospective pharmacovigilance study was conducted using FAERS data from Q1 2004 to Q3 2024. Reports involving cyclobenzaprine as the primary suspect drug were analyzed. Descriptive statistics and disproportionality analyzes, including Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multinomial Gamma Poisson Shrinkage (MGPS), were employed to detect safety signals. Subgroup analyzes were performed to explore demographic heterogeneity. Furthermore, the Weibull distribution was utilized to construct a model for the risk of adverse events as time progresses. Results: Out of 18,289,374 AE reports, 2,425 were linked to cyclobenzaprine. Employing four distinct computational approaches at the preferred term (PT) level, we pinpointed 1,100 PTs signifying remarkable adverse reactions. The adverse reactions listed on the drug's label, like cardiac arrest, respiratory arrest, drug hypersensitivity, dizziness, and somnolence, presented conspicuous signals. In addition, we discovered potential adverse reactions not detailed on the label, for example, toxicity to various agents, completed suicide, drug abuse, overdose, drug interaction, and confusional state. Subgroup analysis brought to light gender-specific AEs. Males had a higher likelihood of experiencing delirium and hallucinations, whereas females were more inclined to encounter drug hypersensitivity and muscle spasms. The vast majority of these AEs were reported during the first month of cyclobenzaprine treatment, with a median onset time of 7 days. Conclusion: This study confirms known AEs associated with cyclobenzaprine and identifies new potential risks, such as toxicity and suicidal behavior. These findings underscore the need for enhanced monitoring and further research to mitigate risks, particularly in vulnerable populations. Clinicians should remain vigilant for both somatic and psychiatric AEs when prescribing cyclobenzaprine, especially in patients with a history of mental health issues or substance abuse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.