ArticlemAbs2025
AbDesign: database of point mutants of antibodies with associated structures reveals poor generalization of binding predictions from machine learning models.
Article in mAbs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- ASD: antigen-specific antibody database.mAbs · 2026Article
- AbTune: layer-wise selective fine-tuning of protein language models for antibodies.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Benchmarking antigen-aware inverse folding methods for antibody design.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Fitness Landscape for Antibodies 2: Benchmarking Reveals That Protein AI Models Cannot Yet Consistently Predict Developability Properties.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- AbAgym: a well-curated dataset for the mutational analysis of antibody-antigen complexes.mAbs · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibodies are naturally evolved molecular recognition scaffolds that can bind a variety of surfaces. Their designability is crucial to the development of biologics, with computational methods holding promise in accelerating the delivery of medicines to the clinic. Modeling antibody-antigen recognition is prohibitively difficult, with data paucity being one of the biggest hurdles. Current affinity datasets comprise a small number of experimental measurements, which are often not standardized between molecules. Here, we address these issues by creating a dataset of seven antigens with two antibodies each, for which we introduce a heterogeneous set of mutations to the CDR-H3 measured by ELISA. Each of the parental complexes has a known crystal structure. We perform benchmarking of state-of-the-art affinity prediction algorithms to gauge their effectiveness. Current computational methods exhibit substantial limitations in accurately predicting the effects of single-point mutations. In contrast, the older empirical, physics-based method FoldX performs well in identifying mutants that retain binding. These findings highlight the need for more resources like the one presented here, i.e. large, molecularly diverse, and experimentally consistent datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.