Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41058445›Full record

ArticleActa dermato-venereologica2025

Curettage vs Electrodessication for Paediatric Molluscum Contagiosum: Efficacy and Safety Follow-Up Study.

Daniel Hilewitz, Efrat Bar-Ilan, Noa Hadayer, Ayelet Ollech, Tal Kind, Shoshana Greenberger

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel HilewitzPediatric Dermatology Unit, The Department of Dermatology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Grey Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Efrat Bar-IlanPediatric Dermatology Unit, The Department of Dermatology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Grey Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Noa HadayerPediatric Dermatology Unit, The Department of Dermatology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Ayelet OllechGrey Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Current affiliation: Pediatric Dermatology Service, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Tal KindPediatric Dermatology Unit, The Department of Dermatology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Shoshana GreenbergerPediatric Dermatology Unit, The Department of Dermatology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Grey Faculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. shoshana.greenberger@sheba.health.gov.il.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molluscum contagiosum (MC) is a common paediatric cutaneous infection caused by a DNA poxvirus, resulting in lesions that often impair patients' quality of life. Although MC typically resolves spontaneously, parents frequently seek treatment due to cosmetic concerns, pruritus, or fear of lesion spread. Currently, there is no gold standard treatment, and various therapeutic modalities - including curettage and electrodessication (ED) - are utilized in clinical practice. This prospective comparative study aimed to compare efficacy, cosmetic outcome, and patient satisfaction with curettage vs ED as treatment methods in the treatment of MC. The study included 103 paediatric patients presenting with confirmed MC and ≥ 10 lesions (or 5 on face), treated at Sheba Medical Center. Treatment allocation to either curettage or ED was based on guardian preference. Data collected included demographic and clinical characteristics, procedural outcomes, pain levels, and satisfaction ratings. Structured questionnaires were administered 6 weeks post-procedure to evaluate outcomes, including lesion recurrence, infection, remnants, healing duration, and patient/parent satisfaction. Statistical analyses were conducted, with statistical significance defined as p ≤ 0.05. Among the cohort (mean age, 4.37 years; 60% female), 67 (61.7%) patients were treated with curettage and 42 (38.3%) with ED. Most presented with facial lesions (67.96%) and multiple lesion sites (50.5%). Patients treated with curettage reported fewer remnants (42.9% vs 70%, p = 0.007), greater aesthetic satisfaction (p = 0.039), and faster recovery (p = 0.050). Pain levels were comparable between groups, but higher 1-week post-procedure in ED (p = 0.014). Recurrence rates were similar for both methods (49.2% curettage, 35% ED). Curettage offers clear advantages over ED for the treatment of MC, resulting in superior aesthetic outcomes, faster recovery, and lower post-procedural pain. Therefore, curettage should generally be preferred, while ED may be considered for precise interventions in sensitive anatomical areas.

Indexed as

CurettageMolluscum ContagiosumAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesRecurrenceTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID41058445
PMCPMC12517206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.