ArticlePsychophysiology2025
Cognitive Resources and the Engagement of the Precuneus During Irony Processing.
Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social communication and brain network properties: cognitive predictors and modulation by autistic traits.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2026Article
- The neurocognitive aspects of empathy and theory of mind in pragmatic language processing.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- Cognitive Resources and the Engagement of the Precuneus During Irony Processing.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Irony is often considered one of the most complex forms of verbal communication and can serve as an important indicator of communication abilities. An ironic statement conveys a meaning that is the opposite of its literal interpretation. The cognitive processes presumed to be involved in interpreting irony include Theory of Mind (ToM), executive functions, and processing style. At the neural level, processing irony has been associated with activity in the medial prefrontal cortex, inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), posterior superior temporal gyrus (pSTG), precuneus, and inferior parietal lobule, among others. The objective of this study was to examine the cognitive processes and the neural correlates of processing irony in Mexican adults using a novel task designed for Spanish-speaking individuals. A total of 45 participants completed a cognitive assessment and performed a contextual discrepancy task while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging. With the lowest classification accuracy and the slowest response times, the results showed processing irony to be challenging. As expected, processing irony engaged brain regions primarily associated with ToM (e.g., precuneus) and language processing (e.g., IFG and pSTG). In contrast, the identification of literal and unrelated statements activated motor-related areas. Interestingly, no differential activation was found for the processing of white lies. Furthermore, regression models indicated that processing statements within a given context-whether ironic, unrelated, white lies, or literal-engaged cognitive domains related to executive functions, perceptual processing, and social cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.