Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41058167›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2025

Community Participation, Mediation and Advocacy to Harness the Developmental Benefits of Relocation of New Capital of Indonesia for Local Communities: Action Research Linking Community and Government Perspectives.

Ike Anggraeni, Scott Hanson-Easey, Titania Lestarianti, Ismi Mufidah, Lareesa Marie Ryan, Syarifah Masitah, Bramantyo Adi Nugroho, H Fitriansyah, H Jaya Mualimin, Subirman and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ike AnggraeniPublic Health Faculty, Mulawarman University, East Kalimantan, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8315-5216
Scott Hanson-EaseySchool of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Titania LestariantiCommunity Health Centre, Kutai Kartanegara, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia.
Ismi MufidahAji Muhammad Parikesit Hospital, Kutai Kartanegara, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia.
Lareesa Marie RyanSchool of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Syarifah MasitahWahab Syaharani Hospital, Samarinda, East Kalimantan, Indonesia.
Bramantyo Adi NugrohoResearch and Innovation Agency, Provincial Government of East Kalimantan, Indonesia.
H FitriansyahResearch and Innovation Agency, Provincial Government of East Kalimantan, Indonesia.
H Jaya MualiminProvincial Department of Health, East Kalimantan, Indonesia.
SubirmanMulawarman University, East Kalimantan, Indonesia.
Widi SunaryoMulawarman University, East Kalimantan, Indonesia.
Peng BiSchool of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Mohammad Afzal MahmoodSchool of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

Global Partnership Seed Funding Program, University of Adelaide
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIndonesia's relocation of capital from Jakarta to Nusantara (Ibu Kota Negara [IKN], East Kalimantan) presents economic, educational, health and business opportunities for local communities, as well as their hopes and fears. However, the potential benefits arising from the relocation are contingent upon communities' and government stakeholders' readiness to collaborate with each other. This study aimed to invoke community and stakeholder participation, identify community perspectives on needs, and understand relevant government departments' approaches to avail themselves of opportunities.

methodsA community survey (N = 402) was co-designed by the research team, local health stakeholders and delivered to participants by local primary care staff. Qualitative interviews were conducted with seven (n = 7) government stakeholders responsible for policy and planning in social welfare, health, environment, and sanitation, and a community organisation. A seminar with government stakeholders detailing the survey's findings included discussions about how to foster benefits for locals.

resultsSurvey results highlighted that local communities held chiefly positive views on the impact of IKN development. These included enhanced transport networks, business and employment opportunities, and access to healthcare and education. Perceived challenges included local communities' relative disadvantage in competing with new, larger businesses; increased urbanisation; and environmental concerns, including dust pollution and flooding. The seven (7) interviews provided insights into the local and provincial government plans and actions with regard to employment and business opportunities, health, and the health care and the environment.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationLocal GovernmentHumansIndonesiaInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchStakeholder ParticipationSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41058167
PMCPMC12504918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.