ArticleJournal of rehabilitation medicine2025
A feasibility study of digital self-report measurement for brain injury patients utilizing an adapted version of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory - fourth edition.
Article in Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to examine the clinical relevance and usability of the digital self-report version of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory - fourth edition, MPAI-4 (MPAI-4-S-dig). In its paper version, MPAI-4 is well validated for patients with acquired brain injuries (ABIs) and neurological disorders (NDs), but time consuming. An additional aim was to investigate whether MPAI-4-S-dig is reliable for repeated measurements.
settingCommunity neurorehabilitation in Stockholm, Sweden.
methodsMPAI-4-S-dig was administered to 40 patients with ABI or ND 2 weeks apart. Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); clinical relevance of data was assessed through Pearson's Correlation Coefficient with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Community Integration Questionnaire - Revised (CIQ-R), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
resultsICC values ranged from 0.86 to 0.93 for total and subscales. Significant correlations were found between MPAI-4-S-dig participation and CIQ-R Total, social integration and home integration and MoCA naming, MPAI-4-S-dig adjustment and CIQ-R Social integration, MPAI-4-S-dig Total and all subscale scores and HADS Anxiety score, MPAI-4-S-dig Total, abilities and participation and HADS Depression.
conclusionThe demonstrated reliability and clinical relevance of MPAI-4-S-dig for patients undergoing neurorehabilitation permits the implementation of digital data capture in patients with mild acquired cognitive impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.