ArticleThe British journal of educational psychology2026
Pre-service teachers' explicit and implicit stereotypes towards pupils with different special educational needs.
Article in The British journal of educational psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSuccessful inclusion in education depends heavily on the attitudes of teachers, and stereotypes play a significant role in shaping these attitudes. However, social desirability bias may limit direct measures of stereotypes. Combining direct and indirect measures offers better insights. But studies on SEN-specific stereotypes combining these measures are rare.
aimsThis study aims to investigate and compare pre-service teachers' explicit and implicit stereotypes towards autistic pupils, pupils with Down syndrome, and pupils with dyslexia using direct and indirect measures. SAMPLE: Our sample consisted of N = 76 German pre-service teachers with an average age of 22.75 years (SD = 3.32), of which 61% identified as female.
methodsWe assessed explicit stereotypes via a questionnaire and implicit stereotypes using lexical decision tasks. To compare explicit and implicit stereotypes, we computed Kendall's tau correlation coefficients.
resultsParticipants rated stereotypical adjectives significantly above the neutral midpoint for all three groups. They responded significantly faster to stereotypical than to non-stereotypical words in the lexical decision tasks, with large effect sizes for explicit ratings and medium effect sizes for implicit measures. Explicit and implicit stereotypes did not correlate significantly with one another.
conclusionThe study found that pre-service teachers clearly endorsed explicit stereotypes and showed implicit associations in line with these stereotypes, especially towards autistic pupils and those with Down syndrome, while patterns for dyslexia were less pronounced. These results underline how common such stereotypes are in educational contexts and suggest that interventions should address both explicit and implicit bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.