Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41058066›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of laboratory hematology2026

Diagnosing Systemic Mastocytosis: State of the Art.

Anton Rets, Tracy I George

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of laboratory hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Diagnosing Systemic Mastocytosis: State of the Art.International journal of laboratory hematology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anton RetsDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2148-162X
Tracy I GeorgeDepartment of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5478-7847

Funding

ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advent of effective multikinase and selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors in systemic mastocytosis, diagnosing this rare disease has been critical to improving patient morbidity and mortality. This state-of-the-art review interprets the international diagnostic criteria, including differences between the WHO 5th edition classification and the International Consensus Classification. Subclassification of systemic mastocytosis is critical for correct therapeutic strategies, and diagnostic difficulties are described for the practicing pathologist. Morphologic mimics, which require alternative treatment, are discussed.

Indexed as

Mastocytosis, SystemicDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansbone marrowmast‐cell diseasemastocytosisneoplasiapathology

Identifiers

PMID41058066
PMCPMC13155293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.