Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41058045›Full record

ReviewThe Plant cell2025

Nonphotochemical quenching in plants: Mechanisms and mysteries.

Herbert van Amerongen, Roberta Croce

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Plant cell, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Herbert van AmerongenLaboratory of Biophysics, Wageningen University, Wageningen 6708 WE, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9783-2895
Roberta CroceBiophysics of Photosynthesis, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1081 HZ, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3469-834X

Funding

NWO OCENW.GROOT.2019.86
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants are vulnerable to photodamage when exposed to light intensities that exceed their photosynthetic capacity. To protect themselves, they activate nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ), a set of processes that dissipate excess excitation energy as heat. NPQ has been studied extensively; however, the field remains conceptually fragmented, and consensus on the underlying mechanisms has yet to be reached. Interest in NPQ has recently intensified due to studies showing that tuning NPQ regulation can lead to substantial improvements in photosynthetic efficiency and even crop yield increases of up to 30%. In this review, we aim to bring structure to the diverse and sometimes contradictory NPQ literature by framing the discussion around a set of key mechanistic questions. We focus on the fastest component of NPQ, known as qE, which is activated within the first minutes of excess light exposure. Topics addressed include the molecular properties and roles of PsbS and zeaxanthin, potential conformational changes in light-harvesting complexes, reorganization of the thylakoid membrane, and the interplay among these factors. We synthesize the available evidence into a working model in which qE arises largely from a localized conformational switch in a small number of antenna complexes, triggered by PsbS, whereas zeaxanthin increases the domain size of the antenna that can be quenched by each of these quenchers.

Indexed as

PhotosynthesisPlantsLightLight-Harvesting Protein ComplexesPhotosystem II Protein ComplexThylakoidsZeaxanthinsLight-Harvesting Protein ComplexesPhotosystem II Protein ComplexZeaxanthins

Identifiers

PMID41058045
PMCPMC12619064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.