ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2025
Co-detection of mutations and methylations in cerebrospinal fluid ctdna for minimally-invasive diagnosis of brainstem glioma.
Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGenetic and epigenetic profiles are critical in managing brainstem gliomas (BSG), whose heterogeneity is far beyond the realm of the Diffuse midline glioma, H3K27 altered. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based liquid biopsy provides minimally-invasive strategies to acquire molecular information for brain tumors, whereas there is a deficiency in techniques for co-detection of genetic and epigenetic alterations due to the limited yield of ctDNA. This study aims to develop a reliable minimally-invasive approach to simultaneously detect the mutation and methylation profiles in the CSF ctDNA of BSGs, thereby enhancing diagnostic accuracy, prognostic capability, and monitoring potential.
methodsA cohort of 80 BSG cases with 138 CSF samples and 71 tissues was retrospectively established. Public tissue methylation profiles (N = 1016) were used for the development of H3K27M and IDH mutation-specific assay. The mutation and methylation co-detection classifier (BSGdiag) was trained and tested in tissue cohorts and further validated in CSF samples. CSF Methylation Risk Score (MRS) was defined and used for prognostication and monitoring.
resultsThe methylation assay demonstrated robust three-class (H3K27M-mut, IDH-mut and double-wildtype) classification with microAUC values of 1.00, 0.973, and 0.813 across public datasets, tissue cohorts, and CSF samples, respectively. BSGdiag achieved a sensitivity of 95.6%, specificity of 83.3%, and AUC of 0.949 for the H3K27M subtype, and a microAUC of 0.990 for the three-class classification in CSFs. MRS-stratified CSF methylation risk group was an independent prognostic factor (HR = 2.61, 95% CI: 1.09-6.25, P = 0.032). Methylation information in CSF remained even with clinical, radiological and CSF genetic indications of no disease, suggesting its utility in monitoring minimal residual disease.
conclusionsThe study de novo developed the first methylation assay for robust BSG molecular subtyping and introduced a novel methodology for co-detecting CSF ctDNA mutations and methylation in BSGs. The BSGdiag enhances the utility of ctDNA by leveraging both genetic and epigenetic information. Its comprehensiveness, minimal invasiveness, robustness, and reliability make it highly promising for future clinical applications and trial designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.