ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2025
Beyond dikarya: 28S metabarcoding uncovers cryptic fungal lineages across a tidal estuary.
Article in Environmental microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fungi are key drivers of biogeochemical processes, yet marine fungi remain understudied and under-characterized due to primer biases and database gaps. In this study, we conducted a metabarcoding survey targeting the small and large subunit rRNA genes and the internal transcribed spacer region of fungi (18S, 28S, and ITS2) in the sediment and surface water of salt and brackish marshes in the North Inlet-Winyah Bay estuarine system (Georgetown, South Carolina, USA). The universal 18S/16S primer set (515F-Y and 926R) identified few fungal taxa. The ITS2 primer set (ITS3mix and ITS4) revealed high diversity among Dikarya but failed to capture the full extent of early diverging fungi (EDF). In contrast, the 28S primer set (LR0R and LF402) excelled at identifying EDF lineages, including Chytridiomycota, Mucoromycota, Zoopagomycota, and Blastocladiomycota, many of which dominated the brackish marsh sampling site but were less prevalent in the salt marsh sampling sites. Over half of the fungal OTUs identified by the 28S primer set were from EDF lineages. Copy-normalized 28S qPCR showed that EDF were more abundant in brackish sediments than in the salt marsh. Several putative denitrifying fungi, primarily species from Trichoderma and Purpureocillium, were also detected, suggesting overlooked functional guilds that may contribute to estuarine nitrogen cycling. A FUNGuild analysis found that most lineages were saprotrophic. Overall, our findings show that EDF are key contributors to community differences across salinity gradients and may play more important functional roles in coastal biogeochemistry than is currently understood. The 28S primer set is ideal for marine fungal metabarcoding because it provides comprehensive taxonomic coverage and enables phylogenetic analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.