ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2025
Functional characterization of BRCA1 variants of unknown significance using homologous recombination repair assays.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identification of non-oncology drugs with activity against inflammatory and triple-negative breast cancer cell lines.Oncology letters · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inherited mutations in BRCA1 are among the primary causes of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). Genetic testing has identified numerous pathogenic and benign mutations in BRCA1, but also thousands of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) with unclear functional consequences. Accurate cancer risk prediction for carriers of these VUS requires functional assays to assess their pathogenicity. In this study, we analyzed 16 BRCA1 VUS detected at the Hereditary Cancer Genetic Counseling Laboratory in Salamanca, Spain, with the goal of providing additional data to guide their reclassification. Since homologous recombination (HR) is the primary tumor-suppressive function of BRCA1, we employed two complementary HR repair assays to evaluate HR efficiency. The first, an already established assay, uses a HeLa-DR cell line harboring an HR reporter cassette and involves silencing endogenous BRCA1 followed by complementation with the VUS under study. The second, developed in this work, is also based in complementation assays that restore the green fluorescence protein (GFP) gene, and employs a breast cancer cell line with a similar HR reporter system (HCC1937-HR) that lacks BRCA1 expression, allowing direct complementation. Both assays consistently identified five VUS (p.V11G, p.H888Y, p.G1201S, p.Q1395R, and p.F1734L) as pathogenic due to significantly reduced HR efficiency, whereas the remaining 11 VUS were benign in terms of HR function. Notably, two pathogenic variants (p.H888Y, p.G1201S) were located outside the known functional domains of BRCA1. The five HR-deficient variants were further evaluated for their sensitivity to ionizing radiation, which confirmed the deleterious impact on DNA repair for variants p.V11G, p.H888Y, p.G1201S and p.F1734L. Sensitivity to the PARP inhibitor olaparib revealed hypersensitivity only in cells expressing p.V11G and p.F1734L, suggesting variant-specific mechanistic effects with potential therapeutic relevance. In conclusion, recombination-based functional assays complemented with sensitivity assays are effective tools for assessing the pathogenicity of BRCA1 VUS and can provide valuable information to support clinical decision-making. We propose that these assays can be completed within a timeframe compatible with clinical needs, offering critical insights for genetic counseling and personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.