Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41057905›Full record

ArticleArthroplasty (London, England)2025

Alpha defensin immunoassay is more effective for ruling out rather than diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI): a prospective cohort study.

Mohammad Kamal Abdelnasser, Ayat Bakhet, Amal Hosni, Dalia Tarik Kamal, Osama Bakr Osman, Mohammed Anter Abdelhameed, Mohamed Ma Moustafa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroplasty (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohammad Kamal AbdelnasserOrthopedic Department, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, 71515, Egypt.
Ayat BakhetClinical Pathology Department, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, 71515, Egypt.
Amal HosniClinical Pathology Department, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, 71515, Egypt.
Dalia Tarik KamalClinical Pathology Department, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, 71515, Egypt.
Osama Bakr OsmanClinical Pathology Department, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, 71515, Egypt.
Mohammed Anter AbdelhameedOrthopedic Department, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, 71515, Egypt. Mohammedanter@med.aun.edu.eg.
Mohamed Ma MoustafaOrthopedic Department, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, 71515, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate and timely diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is of utmost importance. Although synovial alpha-defensin has shown potential as a biomarker, recent studies have questioned its additional benefit over traditional synovial biomarkers and advised against its routine use. The primary objective is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the alpha-defensin immunoassay in PJI. Secondary objectives include comparing its diagnostic accuracy against traditional biomarkers and assessing our results in the context of existing research to provide a solid perspective on its clinical utility.

methodsThis is a prospective cohort study. Synovial samples were obtained at the time of revision arthroplasty or from painful arthroplasties. A complete laboratory workup was performed, including CBC, ESR, CRP, WBCs count. Synovial samples were analyzed for leucocytic count, PMN percentage, leucocyte esterase, and alpha-defensin immunoassay. Culture and sensitivity, and histopathology were also done. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were classified into septic and aseptic according to MSIS criteria.

resultsNinety joints met our inclusion criteria. Alpha-defensin immunoassay was positive in 36 joints and negative in 54 joints, with 1 false positive and 3 false negatives, resulting in a sensitivity of 92.11% (95% CI, 78.62-98.34%), a specificity of 98.08% (95% CI, 89.74-99.95%), positive predictive value (PPV) of 49.43% (95% CI, 12.28-87.22%), negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.84% (95% CI, 99.52-99.94%) and diagnostic accuracy of 97.96% (95% CI, 92.48-99.78%). The optimal cutoff was 9.2, and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.945.

conclusionsWhile the alpha defensin immunoassay is not recommended to be used routinely as a screening method for PJI, its high specificity and NPV make it a valuable addition to traditional blood and synovial parameters in the diagnosis of complex hip and knee PJI, particularly for ruling out infection.

Indexed as

Alpha defensinBiomarkerPeriprosthetic joint infection (PJI)Total joint arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID41057905
PMCPMC12506515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.