Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41057872›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2025

Review of wing morphology in fossil and modern species of humpbacked flies (Diptera: Phoridae).

Mélanie C M Herbert, André Nel, Brian V Brown, Antonio Arillo, Brendon E Boudinot, Mónica M Solórzano-Kraemer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mélanie C M Herbert1Paläontologie und Historische Geologie, Senckenberg Forschunginstitut und Naturmuseum, Senckenberganlage 25, Frankfurt-Am-Main, 60325, Germany. melanie.herbert@senckenberg.de.
André NelInstitut Systématique Evolution Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, Université Des Antilles, Paris, France.
Brian V BrownDepartment of Entomology, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90007, USA.
Antonio ArilloDepartamento de Biodiversidad, Facultad de Biología, Universidad Complutense, Ecología y Evolucíon, Madrid, Spain.
Brendon E BoudinotEntomology II, Abteilung Terrestrische Zoologie, Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum, Senckenberganlage 25, Frankfurt-Am-Main, 60325, Germany.
Mónica M Solórzano-Kraemer1Paläontologie und Historische Geologie, Senckenberg Forschunginstitut und Naturmuseum, Senckenberganlage 25, Frankfurt-Am-Main, 60325, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 457837041 (SO 894/6-1)Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry, and Competitiveness CGL2014-52163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe wing veins of known fossil and living phorids are reduced, making them difficult to homologise. Consequently, different interpretations have led to much confusion over the years. However, veins are crucial for phylogenetic and taxonomy studies, especially for fossils. We addressed these challenges by studying Cretaceous specimens, which exhibit fewer reductions in wing veins compared to modern fauna, along with post-Cretaceous specimens that display recent wing patterns. Furthermore, we examined related families such as Ironomyiidae, Platypezidae, Opetiidae, and Lonchopteridae to show wing similarities to the Phoridae.

resultsWe propose two wing models that include the majority of veins found in each taxon. The early model (Phoridae sensu lato, including Sciadocerinae + "†Prioriphorinae") consists of most Cretaceous species, except †Metopina goeleti from New Jersey amber, which displays a recent pattern. The recent model (Phoridae sensu stricto, i.e. Euphorida) is present in the majority of recent phorids. Based on this new interpretation, we re-evaluate three holotypes of Phoridae: †Euliphora grimaldii, †Prioriphora schroederhohenwarthi, and †Ulrichophora lobata. Additionally, we described a Phoridae specimen belonging to †Prioriphora in the Fouras-Bois Vert amber (France) and a new genus within the Ironomyiidae family in the San Just amber (Spain).

conclusionThe newly proposed wing models facilitate rapid identification of Phoridae wing veins based on their degree of reduction. The two newly described specimens are the first records of these taxa in their respective localities.

Indexed as

DipteraFossilsWings, AnimalAnimalsBiological EvolutionPhylogenyAmberBrachyceraCretaceousInsectaNew speciesWing vein terminology

Identifiers

PMID41057872
PMCPMC12505603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.