ArticleBMC nursing2025
Construction of a prediction model for sleep disturbances in Chinese nurses and identification of predictive factors: based on explainable machine learning methods.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Risk Stratification of Presenteeism in Clinical Nurses: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- A MLP based predictive model for risk assessment of workplace violence for emergency nurses in China.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe demands of nursing work include high pressure, high intensity, and low substitutability. Coupled with the complex work environment, including patient-nurse relationships, colleague interactions, shift work, and night shifts, these factors present significant sleep challenges for nurses. A risk prediction model for sleep disturbances in nurses was developed using various machine learning (ML) algorithms to enhance the accuracy of identifying associated predictive factors.
methodsFrom November 2019 to February 2020, the research team distributed self-assessment questionnaires to 900 nurses in two tertiary general hospitals in China, collecting a total of 728 valid responses. These questionnaires covered baseline characteristics, work-related information, and data on physical and mental health. By integrating multiple ML models, a predictive model for sleep disturbances among nurses was developed using an important subset of features selected through recursive feature elimination. The performance of various ML models was evaluated on the test set and external validation set using metrics such as the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value. Model performance and effectiveness at different thresholds were assessed using calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA). Additionally, the optimal model was selected, and the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was employed for visual interpretation of model features and individual predictions.
resultsThe prevalence of sleep disturbances in Chinese nurses was 41.6%. The multi-layer perceptron (MLP) emerged as the best-performing model, achieving the highest AUC of 0.814 on the test set, slightly ahead of logistic regression (0.808) and XGBoost (0.805). It also demonstrated a competitive accuracy of 0.725. In the external validation set, MLP’ s AUC was 0.798, with an accuracy of 0.728. MLP exhibited balanced performance across various metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1-score. Patient/family incivility, workplace incivility, overcommitment, optimism, hope, ERR, physical fatigue, and years of work experience were identified as significant predictors of sleep disturbances among nurses.
conclusionBased on baseline data, psychological characteristics, and work environment information, we developed ML models to predict sleep disturbances in nurses. Using the SHAP method, we successfully identified key predictive factors. This study highlights the association between work environment/psychological factors and sleep disturbances, suggesting that these factors should be considered in future intervention studies aimed at improving nurses’ sleep quality. CINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.