Observational studyBMC neurology2025
How can we reduce psychological burden for patients of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and their family caregivers? - Insights from the participatory multi-method study "potentiALS".
Observational study in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06441448 (potentiALS - A Multi-method Participatory Aproach to Identify Potentials in Improving Quality of Life Among Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
potentiALS - A Multi-method Participatory Aproach to Identify Potentials in Improving Quality of Life Among Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive, fatal motor neuron disease that severely impacts patients' physical and emotional well-being, while also imposing significant burdens on family caregivers. Despite the high psychosocial demands as part of the multidimensional burden, evidence for effective interventions remains limited. This study employed a participatory approach to assess the support needs of ALS patients and caregivers and to evaluate their preferences for psychosocial therapies to derive a therapeutic framework.
methodsIn this observational multi-method study, ALS patients, their family caregivers, and healthcare professionals (HCPs) were actively involved throughout the research process. Quantitative Data were collected through structured questionnaires assessing quality of life (e.g., MQoL, SEIQoL-Q), depression and anxiety (ADI-12, HADS), and caregiver burden (BSFC-s). Feedback was obtained through structured group sessions that combined brief introductions, practical exercises, and subsequent evaluations of four therapy approaches - cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), psychodynamic therapy (PT), acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), and meaning-centered therapy (MCT).
results14 patients, 17 caregivers and nine HCPs participated in the study. Among patients, ACT was the most frequently selected (37.5%), followed by CBT (31.3%), MCT (18.8%), and PT (12.5%) with similar distribution in caregiver attendance. Across all therapy approaches, both patients and caregivers rated the beneficial aspects highly (mean scores of 4.18, and 4.12, respectively, on a scale from 1 to 5) and identified relatively few limitations (mean scores of 2.18 and 2.09, respectively, on a scale from 1 to 5). HCPs corroborated these findings, noting that while the therapies were effective in offering emotional support and facilitating open dialogue, challenges such as time constraints and adapting interventions for speech limitations remain. Notably, caregivers showed a strong preference for individualized therapy, while patients favored a mix of individual and group formats.
conclusionsOur study highlights the distinct yet interconnected psychosocial needs of ALS patients and their caregivers. Tailored interventions should blend emotional support, open dialogue, and a structured therapeutic framework, while also emphasizing the need for adaptable delivery models in clinical practice. These findings support the development of scalable, patient-centered psychosocial support approaches as part of the multidimensional care in ALS.
trial registrationThe trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (number: NCT06441448, registration date: May 28, 2024).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.