Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41057790›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2025

Unravelling the complexities: a scoping review of the collateral effects on bereaved relatives during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

M Nicolai, A Ullrich, J Ruck, B Jaspers, A Bialobrzeski, R Degutsch, K Oechsle, L Radbruch, I Gágyor, N Hettich-Damm

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

M NicolaiDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
A UllrichPalliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
J RuckDepartment of General Practice, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
B JaspersDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
A BialobrzeskiDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
R DegutschDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
K OechslePalliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
L RadbruchDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
I GágyorDepartment of General Practice, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
N Hettich-DammDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany. nora.hettich@unimedizin-mainz.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dying phase and the loss of a loved one, as well as the grief that follows, are a difficult process in the lives of relatives. These processes have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, as numerous restrictions on contact and care for the dying and deceased have placed an additional burden on relatives. A review was conducted to identify these specific stress factors and their risk factors, as well as support options for bereaved individuals who lost a loved one during the COVID-19 pandemic. The scoping review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews, and the search was conducted in April 2024 (PubMed, Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, and EBSCO Host, including APA PsychArticles, APA PsychInfo, CINAHL, and Medline). Studies involving adults who had lost a loved one during the official period of the COVID-19 pandemic were included, as well as various quantitative and qualitative study types. Studies that focused exclusively on palliative care and the evaluation of interventions were excluded. Studies were selected according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) phases. A total of 58 primary studies and five review articles with a total of 118,062 participants met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The main findings were that the pandemic and the associated measures placed additional burdens on bereaved individuals and exacerbated mental health problems. Visiting restrictions during the dying phase and restrictions on funerals were perceived as particularly stressful. Participants primarily experienced isolation and loneliness, as well as a lack of professional (e.g., from staff accompanying the dying process and the initial grieving process) and social support (e.g., from family and friends). In addition to personal resources and finding meaning, professional and social support were described as the most important factors in coping with grief during and after the pandemic. Consequently, professional, flexible, and comprehensive support from medical and nursing staff in cooperation with counselling centres and psychologists, as well as promotion of social support through networking services, are key issues for future crises.

Indexed as

BereavementCOVID-19FamilyAdaptation, PsychologicalHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Stress, PsychologicalBereaved relativesCovid-19PandemicScoping review

Identifiers

PMID41057790
PMCPMC12505806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.