ArticleBMC palliative care2025
Unravelling the complexities: a scoping review of the collateral effects on bereaved relatives during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The dying phase and the loss of a loved one, as well as the grief that follows, are a difficult process in the lives of relatives. These processes have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, as numerous restrictions on contact and care for the dying and deceased have placed an additional burden on relatives. A review was conducted to identify these specific stress factors and their risk factors, as well as support options for bereaved individuals who lost a loved one during the COVID-19 pandemic. The scoping review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews, and the search was conducted in April 2024 (PubMed, Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, and EBSCO Host, including APA PsychArticles, APA PsychInfo, CINAHL, and Medline). Studies involving adults who had lost a loved one during the official period of the COVID-19 pandemic were included, as well as various quantitative and qualitative study types. Studies that focused exclusively on palliative care and the evaluation of interventions were excluded. Studies were selected according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) phases. A total of 58 primary studies and five review articles with a total of 118,062 participants met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The main findings were that the pandemic and the associated measures placed additional burdens on bereaved individuals and exacerbated mental health problems. Visiting restrictions during the dying phase and restrictions on funerals were perceived as particularly stressful. Participants primarily experienced isolation and loneliness, as well as a lack of professional (e.g., from staff accompanying the dying process and the initial grieving process) and social support (e.g., from family and friends). In addition to personal resources and finding meaning, professional and social support were described as the most important factors in coping with grief during and after the pandemic. Consequently, professional, flexible, and comprehensive support from medical and nursing staff in cooperation with counselling centres and psychologists, as well as promotion of social support through networking services, are key issues for future crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.