Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41057783›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Evaluating rates and factors associated with cesarean section and inpatient cost among low-risk deliveries in selected U.S. states.

Chen Dun, Shijia Zhang, Shixiong Wei, Khyzer B Aziz, Hadi Kharrazi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chen DunBiomedical Informatics and Data Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. cdun1@jhmi.edu.
Shijia ZhangBiomedical Informatics and Data Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Shixiong WeiBiomedical Informatics and Data Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Khyzer B AzizBiomedical Informatics and Data Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Hadi KharraziBiomedical Informatics and Data Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCesarean sections are commonly performed in the United States, including among patients for whom vaginal delivery may be clinically feasible. This study aimed to evaluate rates and factors associated with cesarean section use and inpatient cost among low-risk deliveries in selected U.S. states.

methodsThis was a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis using Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) State Inpatient database for Maryland, Florida, and Wisconsin between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020. American Hospital Association (AHA) data and median household income quartiles based on the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ) 2018 estimates were included in this study to assess hospital and patient neighborhood characteristics. AHA data was linked to HCUP data using the hospital identifier number. Median household income quartiles were linked to HCUP using ZIP codes. A multivariable generalized estimating equations regression model including a random intercept for hospitals was used to identify patient- and hospital-level characteristics associated with the use of cesarean section.

results245,383 women who underwent a delivery between 2017 and 2020 were included in the analysis. Of these women, 8.1% had cesarean section and 91.9% had vaginal delivery. Mean age was 26.9 (SD ± 4.41) years for cesarean section and 26.9 (SD± 4.37) years for vaginal delivery. An increasing rate of cesarean section was detected during the study period. Higher rates of cesarean section were found among Black and Hispanic women compared to White and Asian, and among women with lower income. Hospitals in Florida had the highest cesarean section rate of 9.4% among low-risk women while Maryland and Wisconsin had rates of 6.3% and 5.3%, respectively. Being Hispanic or Black, having private insurance, and giving birth in a for-profit hospital were associated with higher cesarean section utilization after controlling patient- and hospital-level factors. DISCUSSION: A range of clinical and policy interventions have been implemented over the past decade to reduce cesarean sections among low-risk deliveries; however, we still identified an increasing rate of cesarean section among low-risk women between 2017 and 2020 in select U.S. states. There is an emergent need to revisit policies and interventions that impact cesarean section in these states. Women with low socioeconomic status were more vulnerable to have cesarean sections. Identifying variation in cesarean delivery rates among low-risk populations may inform future efforts to improve maternal care quality.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionDelivery, ObstetricHospital CostsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFloridaHumansInpatientsMarylandPregnancyRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesWisconsinYoung AdultCesarean sectionHCUPInpatient costLow-risk delivery

Identifiers

PMID41057783
PMCPMC12502602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.