ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
Node and edge control strategy identification via trap spaces in Boolean networks.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phenotype Control techniques for Boolean gene regulatory networks.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2023Review
- Phenotype control techniques for Boolean gene regulatory networks.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe study of control mechanisms of biological systems allows for interesting applications in bioengineering and medicine, for instance in cell reprogramming or drug target identification. A control strategy often consists of a set of interventions that, by fixing the values of some components, ensure that the long term dynamics of the controlled system is in a desired state. A common approach to control in the Boolean framework consists in checking how the fixed values propagate through the network, to establish whether the effect of percolating the interventions is sufficient to induce the target state. Although methods based uniquely on value percolation allow for efficient computation, they can miss many control strategies. Exhaustive methods for control strategy identification, on the other hand, often entail high computational costs. In order to increase the number of control strategies identified while still benefiting from an efficient implementation, we introduce the use of trap spaces, subspaces of the state space that are closed with respect to the dynamics, and that can usually be easily computed in biological networks.
resultsThis work presents a method based on value percolation that uses trap spaces to uncover new control strategies. It allows for node interventions, which fix the value of certain components, and edge interventions, which fix the effect that one component has on another. The method is implemented using Answer Set Programming, extending an existing efficient implementation of value percolation to allow for the use of trap spaces and edge control. The applicability of the approach is studied for different control targets in a biological case study, identifying in all cases new control strategies.
conclusionThe method presented here provides a new tool for control strategy identification in Boolean networks that allows for more diversity of interventions and for the possibility of efficiently finding new control strategies that would escape usual percolation-based methods, widening the possibility for potential applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.