Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41057742›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025

Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Survival in MSI-High Stages II and III Colon Cancer: Impact of Histopathologic Risk Stratification.

Metincan Erkaya, Cigdem Benlice, Salih Karahan, Mustafa Oruc, Volkan Ozben, Bilgi Baca, Emre Gorgun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. SEOM‑GETTHI clinical guideline for the practical management of molecular platforms (update 2026).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Metincan ErkayaDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Cigdem BenliceFaculty of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Salih KarahanDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Mustafa OrucDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Volkan OzbenFaculty of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bilgi BacaFaculty of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Emre GorgunDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. gorgune@ccf.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrosatellite instability-high (MSI-H) status in colorectal cancer is associated with a favorable prognosis, but its predictive value for adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) benefit for patients with stage II disease remains controversial, particularly when histopathologic risk factors are taken into account. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of ACT on overall survival (OS) for patients with stage II MSI-H colon cancer stratified by pathologic risk and stage III MSI-H colon cancer.

methodsA retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database (2013-2019) was performed, identifying 8025 patients with stage II or III MSI-H colon adenocarcinoma who underwent surgical resection. The stage II patients were stratified into low- and high-risk cohorts based on adverse pathologic features including pT4 stage, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, positive margins, or and fewer than 12 lymph nodes examined. Inverse probability of treatment-weighting was applied to balance the covariates, and OS was estimated using weighted Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models.

resultsOf the 8025 patients included in the study, 4981 had stage II disease and 3044 had stage III disease. Among the 3501 low-risk stage II patients, ACT was administered to only 5.9% and was not associated with an OS benefit (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-1.47; p = 0.73). In contrast, among the 1480 high-risk stage II patients, 19.1% received ACT, which was associated with a 62% reduction in mortality risk (HR, 0.38; 95% CI 0.25-0.57; p < 0.001). Increasing histopathologic risk burden correlated with higher mortality. In the stage III cohort, ACT was administered to 66.5% of the 3044 patients and significantly improved OS (HR, 0.53; 95% CI 0.45-0.62; p < 0.001). Notably, one third of the patients with stage III disease did not receive ACT despite the guideline recommendations for ACT in this population.

conclusionA patient's MSI-H status alone should not preclude the use of ACT in colon cancer. This study demonstrated a significant survival benefit of ACT for both high-risk stage II and stage III MSI-H patients. Histopathologic risk stratification should guide treatment decisions for stage II MSI-H colon cancer, and ACT may be recommended for patients with multiple adverse pathologic features.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaColonic NeoplasmsMicrosatellite InstabilityAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID41057742
PMCPMC12589266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.