ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Enhanced Detection of Pulmonary Edema in Chest X-rays Using Deep Learning Ensembles with Attention Mechanism.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary edema, defined by the abnormal presence of excess fluid within the lungs, is a severe medical emergency that mandates accurate and immediate diagnosis. The use of classical diagnostic techniques-inspection, palpation, percussion, and auscultation-tends to be subjective and highly dependent on the clinician's experience, potentially resulting in variability in diagnosis and possible delays in treatment. This work provides a deep learning approach to the automatic diagnosis of pulmonary edema from chest X-ray images based on the NIH Chest X-ray dataset. The model based on the proposed CNN obtained a validation loss of 0.3350, an accuracy of 90%, and an F1-score of 0.91. The cross-validation further proved the model to be robust, with a total accuracy of 87%. These findings illustrate the performance of the model in the effective classification of pulmonary edema, hence facilitating quicker and more accurate clinical decision-making. Feature learning and representation were achieved with CNNs, boosted with attention and data augmentation strategies to favor generalization across patient populations and image variations. The integration of transparency aids like attention maps is imperative to validate the model's decision-making process, meeting the key criteria for clinical approval. In summary, this research provides a prospective solution to the early diagnosis of pulmonary edema, further leading to enhanced diagnostic processes and better patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.