Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41057720›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

DECTGoutSys: Reducing False Positive Gout Diagnoses via a Machine Vision Pipeline for Crystal Tophi Identification+Classification in Dual-Energy Computed Tomography (DECT).

Riel Castro-Zunti, Yunjung Choi, Younhee Choi, Hee Suk Chae, Gong Yong Jin, Eun Hae Park, Seok-Bum Ko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Riel Castro-Zunti *Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A9, Canada.
Yunjung Choi *Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, 54907, Jeonju, Jeollabuk-do, Republic of Korea.
Younhee ChoiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A9, Canada.
Hee Suk ChaeResearch Institute of Clinical Medicine, Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, 54907, Jeonju, Jeollabuk-do, Republic of Korea.
Gong Yong JinResearch Institute of Clinical Medicine, Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, 54907, Jeonju, Jeollabuk-do, Republic of Korea.
Eun Hae ParkResearch Institute of Clinical Medicine, Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, 54907, Jeonju, Jeollabuk-do, Republic of Korea. mbgracie@gmail.com.
Seok-Bum KoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A9, Canada. seokbum.ko@usask.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9287-317X

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2021R1G1A1094571Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-201806317
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gout is the world's foremost chronic inflammatory arthritis. Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) images tophi-monosodium urate (MSU) crystal deposits that indicate gout-as an easily recognizable green color, facilitating high sensitivity. However, tophi-like regions ("artifacts") may be found in healthy controls, degrading specificity. To mitigate false positives, we propose the first automated system to localize MSU-presenting crystal deposits from DECT and classify them as gouty tophi or artifacts. Our solution, developed using 47 gout and 27 control patient scans, is three-stage. First, a computer vision algorithm crops green regions of interest (RoIs) from a patient's DECT scan frames and filters obvious false positives. Next, extracted RoIs are classified as tophi or artifact via one of three fine-tuned deep learning models; one model is trained to predict "small" RoIs, another "medium," and the third predicts "large" RoIs. Size thresholds are based on pixel area quartile statistics. Patient-level gout versus control classification is made via a machine learning system trained using a suite of features calculated from the outcomes of the RoI classifiers. Using 6-fold cross-validation, the proposed pipeline achieved a patient-level diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 91.89%, 87.23%, and 100.00%. Using confidence values derived from the majority vote of RoI predictions, the best area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (ROC AUC) is 97.16%. The best RoI-level classifiers achieved mean tophus versus artifact accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and ROC AUC of 89.61%, 85.42%, 93.70%, and 92.72%. Results demonstrate that machine/deep learning facilitates high-specificity gout diagnoses while maintaining respectable sensitivity.

Indexed as

GoutMachine LearningRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiography, Dual-Energy Scanned ProjectionTomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsArtifactsDeep LearningFalse Positive ReactionsHumansSensitivity and SpecificityUric AcidUric AcidClassificationConvolutional neural networksGoutLocalizationMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID41057720
PMCPMC13481961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.