Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41057700›Full record

ReviewNature ecology & evolution2025

Adaptive ecosystem restoration to mitigate zoonotic risks.

Frauke Ecke, Jan C Semenza, Elena Buzan, Federico Costa, Emanuele Giorgi, Junwen Guo, Lucinda Kirkpatrick, Sascha Knauf, Yonas Meheretu, Navinder Singh and 6 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature ecology & evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Frauke EckeOrganismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. Frauke.Ecke@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4208-345X
Jan C SemenzaDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Elena BuzanFaculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0714-5301
Federico CostaInstitute of Collective Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6951-2336
Emanuele GiorgiCHICAS, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0640-181X
Junwen GuoDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3724-4810
Lucinda KirkpatrickSchool of Environment and Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Sascha KnaufInstitute of International Animal Health/One Health, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5744-4946
Yonas MeheretuDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5406-1672
Navinder SinghDepartment of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5131-0004
Henrik SjödinDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Matt TimperleyCHICAS, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3712-5627
Marina TreskovaHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3641-7225
Rainer G UlrichInstitute of Novel and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5620-1528
Caio Graco ZeppeliniInstitute of Collective Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0490-4395
Joacim RocklövDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4030-0449

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infectious diseases pose a substantial threat to global health security. Key wildlife species, potentially harbouring numerous zoonotic pathogens, are increasingly being forced to adapt to disturbances from land-use change, human encroachment and climate change. Although the evidence is rather convincing pertaining to the increased risks of zoonotic diseases with degradation and disturbances, the scientific literature on the mitigating effects of ecosystem restoration on zoonotic spillover is scattered, inconclusive and challenged by the lack of a conceptual framework and practical guidance. In light of rising restoration needs and activities, we outline six critical considerations when examining impacts of zoonotic diseases from ecosystem restoration: (1) assessment of zoonotic disease targets; (2) time lag between restoration and recovery; (3) integration of trophic rewilding; (4) robust study designs; (5) controlling for confounding and modifying drivers; and (6) stakeholder engagement and co-creation with communities. Failure to account for these considerations makes the scientific contribution of restoration less valuable and may even jeopardize global efforts to reverse the global biodiversity decline.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationZoonosesAnimalsBiodiversityClimate ChangeHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.